Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Response to The Crucible


The Crucible was a unique piece of writing; it uses a chain of highly coincidental incidents and made a play. When I think of witchcraft, I think of the period used as the time setting in the play. The author provides elements like McCarthyism, strict religious beliefs, and many devious citizens to make this play all the worth wild. There was no solid evidence to convict these “guilty” people besides the stories told by witnesses, which weren’t always fact. Innocent residents began to be tried to witchcraft because they were associating with the guilty, or someone wanted them dead.

            A medical finding that left doctors without a cure was the reason for the accusations. When they couldn’t find the proper cure, they went to their religious views. This is how they assumed these sicknesses were the work of the Devil. People of the town took this into their own advantage. Abigail twisted the people of the town into turning on one another to be with Proctor, a married man she had held an affair with. Women weren’t supposed to be able to possess much power, but Abigail had more power than need for a female, especially one of her age.

            Many citizens died because they weren’t favored, or they were defending what they believed in. Defying the court wasn’t acceptable, but some people did this by accepting death over siding with the court. These people preferred their dignity over pleasing others with false truths. Many favored people were accused but slightly saved by the court, because they were known religious people. I don’t believe anybody should be spared, highly religious or not.
272 words

No comments:

Post a Comment